Home Ahead of print Instructions Contacts
About us Current issue Submit article Advertise  
Editorial board Archives Subscribe Login   
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 25  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 196-200

Outcome of gans repositioning maneuver in patients with posterior canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo with cervical spondylosis


1 Department of ENT, ACS Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
2 Department of Community Medicine, ACS Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

Correspondence Address:
Dr. H Gayathri
Associate Professor, Department of ENT, ACS Medical College and Hospital, Velappanchavadi, Chennai - 600 077, Tamil Nadu
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/indianjotol.INDIANJOTOL_62_19

Rights and Permissions

Background and Objectives: Cervical spondylosis and BPPV often co-exist in older population. As GRM doesn't involve hyperextension of neck, which is better avoided among patients with cervical spine pathology, we decided to assess the outcome of GRM in patients with cervical spondylosis in terms of safety & efficacy. Methodology: Twenty patients with clinically proven posterior semicircular canal BPPV and radiologically evident cervical spondylosis without symptomatic spondylotic myelopathy or radiculopathy or severe restriction of neck or back movement were enrolled. GRM was done on the first day and repeated until resolution of nystagmus, for a maximum of four times. Lack of response to GRM even after fourth attempt was considered as failure. The manuever was repeated in the successful group on day two and after one week & these patients were followed up for one month. Results: Overall, 75% of the patients (50.9% to 91.3% - 95% C.I.) had a successful repositioning maneuver. Favourable parameters for better chances of cure were higher age (>55 years), male gender & higher grade of cervical spondylosis. 20% of patients had experienced temporary pain for few hours on the day of maneuver. None of the patients who had less than two attempts of GRM had post-procedure pain. Clinically, none of the patients had precipitation of cervical myelopathy or radiculopathy. Conclusion: GRM is a safe & effective particle repositioning maneuver for patients with posterior semicircular canal BPPV with co-existent cervical spondylosis.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed378    
    Printed4    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded24    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal