Home Ahead of print Instructions Contacts
About us Current issue Submit article Advertise  
Editorial board Archives Subscribe Login   
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2014  |  Volume : 20  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 33-36

Piston diameter in stapes surgery. Does it have a bearing?


Department of Otolaryngology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research Chandigarh, Punjab, India

Correspondence Address:
Naresh Kumar Panda
Department of Otolaryngology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh - 160 012, Punjab
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0971-7749.129813

Rights and Permissions

Aims and Objectives: This prospective randomized controlled trial was done to study the effect of piston diameter on hearing outcomes after stapedotomy. Materials and Methods: All the patients diagnosed to have otosclerosis were included in the study. A total of 52 patients were studied ranging in age from 18 to 50 years. The subjects were randomized into two groups, that is, 0.4 mm piston (group A) and 0.6 mm piston (group B). The subjects were taken up for small fenestra stapedotomy using either a 0.4 or 0.6 mm piston. The main outcome measures were hearing improvement, air-bone gap closure, and overclosure of air-bone gap. Results: There was no statistical difference in hearing improvement in two different piston diameters, 0.4 and 0.6 mm at speech frequencies. In group A, the air-bone gap improvement in the third follow-up was not significant (P > 0.05), whereas group B showed a statistically significant improvement (P = 0.003). The mean overclosure of air-bone gap was better in patients with 0.4 mm piston at speech frequencies and also at 250 Hz. Significantly, overclosure of air-bone gap at higher frequencies (4 and 8 KHz) was seen only with a smaller sized piston. (0.4 mm). Discussion: We analyzed the effect of piston diameter on the hearing results after small fenestra stapedotomy by using similar surgical procedure and similar prosthesis in all patients. Conclusion: There is evidence to suggest that 0.4 mm piston may be better suited for providing optimum hearing results.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2159    
    Printed51    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded270    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 3    

Recommend this journal