Home Ahead of print Instructions Contacts
About us Current issue Submit article Advertise  
Editorial board Archives Subscribe Login   


 
 Table of Contents  
CASE REPORT
Year : 2012  |  Volume : 18  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 156-160

Auditory neuropathy/Auditory dyssynchrony - An underdiagnosed condition: A case report with review of literature


Department of E.N.T., Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, (HIHT University), Jollygrant, Doiwala, Dehradun, Uttaranchal, India

Date of Web Publication12-Nov-2012

Correspondence Address:
Saurabh Varshney
Department of E.N.T., Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, (HIHT University), Jollygrant, Doiwala, Dehradun 248 140, Uttaranchal
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0971-7749.103445

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Auditory neuropathy (AN)/auditory dyssynchrony (AD) is a very often missed diagnosis, hence an underdiagnosed condition in clinical practice. Auditory neuropathy is a condition in which patients, on audiologic evaluation, are found to have normal outer hair cell function and abnormal neural function at the level of the eighth nerve. These patients, on clinical testing, are found to have normal otoacoustic emissions, whereas auditory brainstem response audiometry reveals the absence of neural synchrony. Unlike space-occupying lesions, radiologic evaluation reveals normal results. Patients with auditory neuropathy require a different management approach to their auditory and communication problems from approaches used with patients with usual peripheral hearing losses.

Keywords: Auditory brainstem responses, Auditory neuropathy, Otoacoustic emission


How to cite this article:
Agarwal V, Varshney S, Bist SS, Bhagat S, Mishra S, Jha V. Auditory neuropathy/Auditory dyssynchrony - An underdiagnosed condition: A case report with review of literature. Indian J Otol 2012;18:156-60

How to cite this URL:
Agarwal V, Varshney S, Bist SS, Bhagat S, Mishra S, Jha V. Auditory neuropathy/Auditory dyssynchrony - An underdiagnosed condition: A case report with review of literature. Indian J Otol [serial online] 2012 [cited 2019 Mar 22];18:156-60. Available from: http://www.indianjotol.org/text.asp?2012/18/3/156/103445


  Introduction Top


Auditory neuropathy (AN), also known as 'neural dyssynchrony / auditory dyssynchrony (AD), [1] is a hearing loss due to abnormal neural processing of auditory stimuli. Patients with this disorder are able to respond to sounds appropriately, but their ability to decode speech and language is hindered. These patients have hearing loss ranging from mild to severe with poor speech perception abilities. AN/AD has only recently been described. In the late 1970s, clinical investigators began to describe groups of patients with normal or slightly elevated audiogram pure tone thresholds accompanied with absent or severely abnormal auditory brainstem responses (ABRs). With the advent of the otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) in the mid 1980s, these groups of patients were found to have normal cochlear function. The finding of normal cochlear function accompanied with abnormal brainstem responses was defined in 1996 as auditory neuropathy (AN). Whether this represents a true auditory nerve neuropathy is debatable. Further investigations led to the conclusion that AN may truly represent a dyssynchronous auditory nerve rather than a neuropathy. This finding gave rise to the newer term of auditory dyssynchrony (AD). [1] For the purposes of this article, AN and AD are considered synonymous (i.e., AN/AD). AN can affect people of all ages, from infancy to adulthood. The purpose of this article is to discuss clinical presentation, audiological tests, and its management options, as AN is very often missed as a diagnosis in clinical practice.


  Case Report Top


A 16-year-old female student presented with complains of insidious, progressive hearing loss for 2 years in both ears. There was no history of any ear discharge, trauma, ototoxicity, or any other medical or surgical illness. There was no contributory antenatal, perinatal, and postnatal history. She was born as full term normal vaginal delivery in hospital. There was no history suggestive of hearing loss in the family. On clinical examination, bilateral otoscopy was normal. On performing Tuning fork tests, Rinne's test was positive bilaterally, Weber's test was centralized, and absolute bone conduction test was reduced bilaterally. Rest of the ENT and head neck examination was normal. Pure tone audiometry (PTA) showed moderately severe sensorineural hearing loss (Avg. 65 dB) on right side and mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss (Avg. 40 dB) on left side, which was more for lower frequencies [Figure 1]. Speech discrimination scores were out of proportion with suspected hearing loss. Tympanometry showed bilaterally 'A' type of curve with absence of ipsilateral and contralateral reflexes [Figure 2]. Otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE/TPOAE) were present for both ears [Figure 3]. On ABR, no definite V th waves were seen on either side, even after 90 dB and 96 dB [Figure 4]. The patient underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of brain and HRCT temporal bone, which were normal. Hence, a diagnosis of AN was made as patient had history of bilateral hearing loss; PTA showed bilateral sensorineural hearing loss, OAE was present bilaterally, but ABR showed severe sensorineural hearing loss in both ear. The patient was advised cochlear implant, but she could not afford it. Hence, patient was advised use of hearing aid for both ears, which she is using with some gain.
Figure 1: Pure Tone Audiogram- Right Ear-moderate to severe SN hearing loss; Left Ear-mild to moderate SN hearing loss. (Note: Conductive component could be seen on low frequency)

Click here to view
Figure 2: Tympanometry- Bilateral "A" type of curve, without ipsi and contralateral acoustic reflex. (Impression: No indication of middle ear pathology)

Click here to view
Figure 3 (a, b): Otoacostic emission (O.A.E.)- TEAOE and DPOAE- showing bilateral normal cochlear function

Click here to view
Figure 4: ABR- Auditory Brain Response- no definite Vth wave were seen on either side even after 90 dB and 96 Db.

Click here to view


Pathophysiology

The term auditory neuropathy/auditory dyssynchrony (AN/AD) describes a diagnosis that affects a small group of patients with hearing loss and speech intelligibility scores out of proportion with their presumed hearing loss. Many authors have suggested that the abnormalities that cause AN reside within the lower auditory system. Specifically, the spiral ganglion cells, auditory nerve, or the auditory brainstem nuclei have all been implicated. The combination of a dysfunctional auditory nerve with preservation of cochlear function can theoretically be caused at several different points along the lower auditory pathway. The following abnormalities have been proposed:

  • Injury to the synaptic junction between inner hair cells of the cochlea and dendrites of spiral ganglion neurons
  • Direct damage to the dendrites of the spiral ganglion neurons
  • Direct injury to the spiral ganglion neurons
  • Direct axonal damage to the auditory nerve that causes a cascade of damage to the lower auditory nuclei



  Discussion Top


Auditory neuropathy was first reported in late 1970's as paradoxical findings between ABR and OAE and was defined as auditory neuropathy (AN) in 1996 by Arnold Starr. [2] Madden et al. found that 22 out of 428 children with hearing loss had AN. [3] Some authors have suggested that the prevalence is 2-15% of children with known hearing loss. In a 2002 review of the prevalence, Sininger suggested that approximately 1 in 10 children with hearing loss and severely affected ABR test results have AN. Overall, AN is rare and can be found in an estimated 1-3 children per 10,000 births. [4] In Southern India, prevalence of auditory dys-synchrony was reported around 1 in 183 in individuals with sensory neural hearing loss. [5] Auditory neuropathy / auditory dyssynchrony (AN) has no racial bias and occurs with near-equal frequency in males and females. The patients range in age from infant to adult and display auditory characteristics consistent with normal outer hair cell function and abnormal neural function at the level of the VIII th nerve. Because AN is a relatively newly described condition, many adults may have not obtained the proper audiologic testing to reach a diagnosis of AN. With the advent of newborn hearing screening tests, the delay in diagnosis of AN should be minimized, which will expedite intervention.

Spiral ganglion cells, auditory nerve, or auditory brainstem nuclei have been implicated for the abnormalities that cause AN. Two forms of AN have been suggested (i) pre-synaptic type and (ii) post-synaptic version. [6] AN may also affect vestibular function. [7] Risk factors for AN include neonatal history of anoxia, hyperbilirubinemia, mechanical ventilation, hypoxia, congenital brain abnormalities, low birth weight, extremely premature birth (< 28 wk), and genetic and family history of AN. [3] Berlin et al. described AN in three patient of Charcot-Marrie-Tooth disease, [8] while Doyle, Sininger, and Starr reported AN with Fredrich's ataxia. [9] Bamiou et al. described AN with Refsum's disease. [10] Although a complicated perinatal history is common among most patient with AN, one third of patients have no predisposing factors that lead to the development of AN. Auditory neuropathy is usually bilateral but occasionally can be unilateral also.

These are the different criteria for the diagnosis of AN [11]

  • Absent or severely abnormal ABR test results at maximal stimulus (100 dBnHL)
  • Normal outer hair cell function as determined by OAEs or CMs
  • Absent or elevated stapedial reflex thresholds


HRCT temporal bones should be done to rule out inner ear malformation in infants. Typically, an MRI have limited role in AN (Wang et al. 2003). [12]

A multidisciplinary approach including an otologist/neuro-otologist, speech pathologist, genetic counselor, audiologist, and pediatricians are required to diagnose and manage the patients of AN.

Medical care starts with parents counseling and include speech pathology, hearing aid placement, and use of other hearing devices. Recent studies demonstrate that 50% of children can be benefited from placement of an amplification device.

In 2001, the use of cochlear implantation was expanded to include children with AN. [13] Most recently, if cochlear implantation fails, the option of brainstem implantation has been reported. [14]


  Conclusion Top


Auditory neuropathy (AN) is a term used to describe an auditory disorder, in which there is evidence of normal outer hair cell function (otoacoustic emissions and/or cochlear microphonics) and poor function of the auditory nerve (absent or highly distorted auditory brain stem response starting with wave I). Auditory neuropathy is a hearing disorder that can affect any age and mostly caused by an abnormality in lower auditory pathway. It can be diagnosed by careful history and audiological evaluation by OAE and ABR testing. Various medical and a few surgical options are available to deal with the situation. Some recovery in the auditory system has been reported, but most children affected by AN continue to display abnormal pure tone averages and ABR test results that require a lifelong commitment by the child, family, society, speech pathologist, and audiologist. In a neonatal hearing screening program, checks of ABR and/or Cochlear microphonics should be considered in high risk newborns who undergo OAE testing as their primary screening tool.

 
  References Top

1.Berlin C, Hood L, Rose K. On renaming auditory neuropathy as auditory dyssynchrony. Audiol Today 2001;13:15-7.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Starr A, Picton TW, Sininger Y, Hood LJ, Berlin CI. Auditory neuropathy. Brain 1996;119:741-53.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]    
3.Madden C, Rutter M, Hilbert L, Greinwald JH Jr, Choo DI. Clinical and audiological features in auditory neuropathy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002;9:1026-30.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Sininger YS, Trautwein P. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve via cochlear implants in patients with auditory neuropathy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 2002;189:29-31.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]    
5.Kumar UA, Jayram MM. Prevalence and audiological characteristics in individuals with auditory neuropathy/auditory dys-synchrony. Int J Audiol 2006;45:360-6.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.McMahon CM, Patuzzi RB, Gibson WP, Sanli H. Frequency-Specific Electrocochleography Indicates that Presynaptic and Postsynaptic Mechanisms of Auditory Neuropathy Exist. Ear Hear 2008;29:314-25.  Back to cited text no. 6
[PUBMED]    
7.Sheykholeslami K, Kaga K, Murofushi T, Hughes DW. Vestibular function in auditory neuropathy. Acta Otolaryngol 2000;120:849-54.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]    
8.Berlin CI, Hood LJ, Hurley A, Wen H. Contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions: An index of the function of the medial oliovocochlear system. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1994;110:3-21.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]    
9.Doyle KJ, Sininger Y, Starr A. Auditory neuropathy in childhood. laryngoscope 1998;108:1374-7.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]    
10.Bamiou DE, Spraggs PR, Gibberd FB, Sidey MC, Luxon LM. Hearing loss in adult Refsum's disease. Clin Otolaryngol 2003;28:227-30.  Back to cited text no. 10
[PUBMED]    
11.Devies RA. Retrocochlear hearing disorder, including auditory dyssynchrony In: Gleeson M, Hilbert JS, editors. Scott- Brown's Otorhinolaryngology, head and neck surgery. 7th ed, Vol 3. London: Hodder Arnold; table 241a.5, 2008. p. 3842.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.Wang DY, Bu XK, Xing GQ, Lu L. Neurophysiological characteristics of infants and young children with auditory neuropathy. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 2003;83:281-4.  Back to cited text no. 12
[PUBMED]    
13.Trautwein PG, Sininger YS, Nelson R. Cochlear implantation of auditory neuropathy. J Am Acad Audiol 2000;11:309-15.  Back to cited text no. 13
[PUBMED]    
14.Colletti V, Fiorino FG, Carner M, Miorelli V, Guida M, Colletti L. Auditory brainstem implant as a salvage treatment after unsuccessful cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 2004;25:485-96.  Back to cited text no. 14
[PUBMED]    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Case Report
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed11923    
    Printed96    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded364    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal